|
The cost of going global for China's high-tech companies |
|
|
|
直升机坪,直升机停机坪,直升机坪设计,直升机停机坪设备,直升机坪设计安装,直升机停机坪设计,直升机停机坪设计安装
直升机停机坪
上海企业宣传片制作,上海影视广告
产品设计,工业设计,无锡工业设计,电子产品外观设计
工业设计,产品外观设计,数码产品,仪器仪表,机械设备,家居产品,电子产品外观设计,电子产品外观设计
电子产品外观设计
上海上门anmo|上海********anmo|上海上门保健anmo|上门anmo服务电话
上海搬家公司
壁炉|壁炉设计|欧式壁炉|燃气壁炉|电壁炉|真火壁炉|燃木壁炉
消防泵|高温泵|泥浆泵|油田注水泵|海水淡化泵
消防泵|高温泵|泥浆泵|油田注水泵|海水淡化泵
Speck|高压泵|高压水泵|高压柱塞泵
上海搬家公司
洗地机,高压清洗机
无锡环境检测|室内环境检测|无锡装修污染检测|空气废气TVOC检测(甲醛|苯)检测|无锡废水|辐射|噪音检测
天津办证,天津办假证,天津办证公司
上海搬家公司|上海搬场公司|大众搬场|大众搬家|大众搬家公司|上海搬场公司|上海大众搬家|上海大众搬场|上海大众搬家公司|上海大众搬场公司
上海********安装,上海卫星天线安装,上海********安装维修
seo,网站优化,网站建设|网页设计|网页制作|网站设计|网站制作,上海seo,上海网站优化,上海网站建设|上海网页设计|上海网页制作|上海网站设计|上海网站制作
无锡seo,无锡网站优化|无锡百度优化|无锡谷歌优化
无锡seo,无锡网站优化
无锡网站建设|网页设计|网页制作|网站设计|网站制作
无锡农产品批发|无锡农产品交易|无锡农产品价格|无锡现代农业
toushi眼镜|toushi扑克|麻将|白光眼镜|白光麻将|扑克|toushi扑克眼镜|麻将眼镜
冰蓝服装鞋帽饰品商城|服装批发|童装批发|鞋帽批发|饰品批发
冰蓝服装鞋帽饰品商城|服装批发|童装批发|鞋帽批发|饰品批发
无锡物流公司|中铁物流,中铁快运|物流|货运|物流网|物流公司|货运公司|佳吉物流|货物运输|货物运输公司
中铁物流,中铁快运|物流|货运|物流网|物流公司|货运公司|佳吉物流|货物运输|货物运输公司|无锡物流公司
长株潭信息网|长株潭餐饮美食|休闲娱乐|打折信息|长株潭规划|长株潭人才网|长株潭一体化|长株潭公交 |长株潭汽车站|长株潭房产网|长株潭城际铁路
无锡投影机|无锡投影机维修|换灯泡|除尘
中国模具网|模具培训|模具网
wifi mobile phone
usb flash drive
爱就在一起|爱就宅一起全集|爱就宅在一起在线播放观看|爱就在一起大结局
搞笑图片|QQ表情|qq搞笑图片
恶搞图片|qq恶搞图片|恶搞美女图片|明星恶搞图片
搞笑图片|QQ表情
搞笑儿童|儿童qq搞笑图片|儿童搞笑图片
动物搞笑图|动物搞笑表情|qq动物搞笑表情
节日表情|qq节日表情|qq搞笑表情
美女表情|美女qq表情图片|美女qq表情|qq美女表情包|美女搞笑qq表情
QQ表情|搞笑图片
obama,health care,health care plan,obama s health care plan
上海浦东搬家,上海浦东新区搬场公司,上海浦东搬家公司
上海嘉定搬家,上海嘉定区搬场公司,上海嘉定搬家公司
上海宝山搬家,上海宝山区搬家公司,上海宝山搬家公司
上海长宁搬家,上海长宁区搬场公司,上海长宁搬家公司
上海闵行搬家,上海闵行区搬场公司,上海闵行搬家公司
上海黄浦保洁,上海黄浦区搬场公司,上海黄浦保洁公司
上海静安搬家,上海静安区搬场公司,上海静安搬家公司
上海杨浦搬家,杨浦区搬场公司,上海杨浦搬家公司
上海虹口搬家,上海虹口区搬场公司,上海虹口搬家公司
上海闸北搬家,上海闸北区搬场公司,上海闸北搬家公司
上海徐汇搬家,上海徐汇区搬场公司,上海徐汇搬家公司
上海松江搬家,上海松江区搬场公司,上海松江搬家公司
上海卢湾搬家,上海卢湾区搬场公司,上海卢湾搬家公司
上海普陀搬家,上海普陀区搬场公司,上海普陀搬家公司
上海奉贤搬家,上海奉贤区搬场公司,上海奉贤搬家公司
天津宝坻办证,天津宝坻区办证
天津武清办证,天津武清区办证
天津北辰办证,天津北辰区办证
天津津南办证,天津津南区办证
天津西青办证,天津西青区办证
天津东丽办证,天津东丽区办证
天津大港办证,天津大港区办证
天津汉沽办证,天津汉沽区办证
天津塘沽办证,天津塘沽区办证
天津红桥办证,天津红桥区办证
天津河北办证,天津河北区办证
天津南开办证,天津南开区办证
天津河西办证,天津河西区办证
天津河东办证,天津河东区办证
天津和平办证,天津和平区办证
Mckinsey Quarterly JULY 2008
Chinese technology companies are competing successfully on their home turf. Global markets may be another story, at least in the short run.
Chinese high-tech and electronics companies are outgrowing the domestic market, improving their productivity, and forcefully defending the domestic consumer and corporate markets against foreign challengers. But our research also shows that most of these companies will have difficulty replicating these gains in other countries, where they must cater to very different customers; attract global talent; and confront higher development, sales and marketing, and labor costs.
In an ongoing project with Tsinghua University, in Beijing, we examined the productivity and financial performance of 43,000 state-owned, domestic private-sector, and foreign companies in China across ten technology sectors—aerospace, consumer electronics, enterprise computing, industrial electronics and automation, medical equipment, power equipment, semiconductors, services and software, telecom equipment, and transportation. Despite reports that Chinese manufacturing has lost some of its shine to rising labor costs, our analysis shows that its productivity in these technology sectors rose 11 percent a year from 2001 to 2006, outpacing labor cost increases of 10 percent a year. Productivity measured against unit labor costs remains competitively high compared with that of other low-cost countries, to say nothing of developed ones. As long as productivity grows more rapidly than labor costs, China should remain an attractive location for technology manufacturing.
Our research suggests that productivity gains, together with quality improvements and an emphasis on midrange product segments, will continue to propel the growth of Chinese technology companies, raising their share of the domestic market to around 75 percent by 2010, from 60 percent in 2002. A closer look at the numbers shows that in value-added per employee, private-sector Chinese technology companies are reaching and, at times, surpassing the productivity levels of their foreign-owned rivals in China. Among the largest private-sector Chinese companies—those with annual revenues of about 10 billion renminbi ($1.4 billion)—revenues per employee rose from 226,000 renminbi in 2001 to 417,000 renminbi in 2006, almost matching the 420,000 renminbi of their foreign counterparts. Productivity at state-owned Chinese companies also increased during this period but still trails significantly.
Some of the recent productivity improvements at Chinese technology companies result from increased scale. In 2006, 370 of them—three times as many as in 2001—had annual revenues of 1 billion renminbi or more. At the same time, our analysis shows that the largest companies, domestic and foreign, are easily the most productive. Productivity at companies with annual revenues of more than 10 billion renminbi, for example, is at least twice that of smaller companies. Those with annual revenues in excess of 1 billion renminbi also have an edge over small and midsize companies.
Scale has spurred productivity and helps Chinese companies to dominate the market in their homeland. However, to secure continued growth, companies must push into overseas markets, which require different skills and higher expenditures on marketing, research, and labor. Our research suggests that by the time a Chinese company’s sales exceed roughly 10 billion renminbi, exports become significantly more important—48 percent of sales, versus 21 percent for companies with sales from 1 billion to 10 billion renminbi—and costs increase drastically. For public- and private-sector companies combined, the largest companies get 39 percent of total sales from exports, compared with 20 percent for the next-largest companies.
Paradoxically, as Chinese technology companies grow in the domestic market, the ratio between R&D costs and revenue falls, since R&D expenses are spread across a rising revenue base. Once a company expands globally, the trend reverses abruptly: for example, as a percentage of revenues, the largest private-sector Chinese companies spend more than twice as much—3.6 percent—on R&D as do the next-largest ones. Globalizing Chinese companies also face cost increases for marketing (because they must build brand recognition and learn the ways of unfamiliar consumers) and for labor (as they begin hiring talent outside their own low-wage domestic market).
Weighed down by higher costs, Chinese technology companies with annual revenues of more than 10 billion renminbi average profit margins of 2.6 percent, compared with 4 percent at those with revenues from 1 billion to 10 billion renminbi. Margins are likely to be hardest hit during the initial phase of globalization, when companies make large investments to raise their game. But when Chinese companies start learning to serve global markets, margins improve as costs stabilize and as the volume of for-eign sales increases.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|